New Parenting Law In Florida

In July 2023 a new parenting law went into effect in Florida for divorce and paternity cases.  The law changes several significant aspects of what is commonly referred to as custody of minor children in Florida.  The most significant change is that the law now provides that there is a rebuttable presumption that equal time-sharing of a minor child is in the best interest of the minor child.  To rebut this presumption, a parent must prove that equal timesharing is not in the best interest of the child.  Historically, there was no presumption in favor of any specific timesharing plan and each family was considered individually as to what plan would be best for the children.  Under this new law, the court will begin with a presumption that the children should spend equal time with each parent and develop a plan accordingly unless it is proven not to be in the child’s best interest.  How the equal timesharing plan is developed is still a consideration that must be resolved.  Some families choose a rotating-week schedule (e.g. exchanging the children each Friday) while other families may be better suited to a divided week schedule (e.g. Mom Monday and Tuesday, Dad Wednesday and Thursday, and rotating Friday through Sunday).  The specifics of each plan will depend upon the work schedules of the parents, the division of parenting responsibilities, and many other factors. 

In addition, the new law addresses the situation where the parents had a long-distance parenting plan because one parent lived more than 50 miles away but then the “away” parent moved back to within the 50-mile radius.  In such a situation, the law now provides that this will be considered a substantial change in circumstances for the modification of the parent plan.  Historically, a parent who moved back to the area where the children lived would not have a basis to modify the plan and may be resigned to minimal time with the children even though they lived nearby.  Now, the law allows for a modification of the parent plan to have more consistent contact with the children for each parent. 

Working out a co-parenting plan is often one of the more difficult issues to be addressed for any family going through transition.  If you need help developing your plan, please contact our office for coaching or mediation. 

2023 Case Law Update

Once again I was invited to present the Annual Case Law Update to this years Family Court Professional Coalition (FCPC) Annual Conference. It is my great pleasure to work with this organization and serve on their Board of Directors in order to help improve the Family Court system in my local area. It is also an annual highlight to present this update of all legal cases involving family law decided in the last year from the Florida appellate courts. While I do not litigate, it remains important to stay up to date on the current law in order to assist my clients in reaching the best resolution to their cases. To view the update click here.

New Florida Alimony Law

Beginning in July 2023 Florida has a new alimony law (Florida Statute 61.08).  Alimony already existed in Florida for many years but with the changes in the law, we now have a formula for calculating alimony and there has been a change to the types of alimony that can be ordered by a judge. 

The purpose of alimony is to provide greater economic assistance in order to allow the recipient of alimony to achieve self-support.  The party requesting alimony has the burden to prove that they have a need for alimony and that the other party has the ability to pay support.  The law defines four types of alimony: (1) Temporary, to provide the party with support during the pendency of the litigation; (2) Bridge-the-gap Alimony, to be provided for a period of not more than two years to a party to making the transition from being married to being single; (3) Rehabilitative Alimony, to be provided for a period of not more than five years, to assist a party to establish the capacity for self-support; and (4) Durational alimony, to provide a party with economic assistance for a set period of time.  In the new law, the statute no longer provides for permanent, periodic alimony.  The statute further modifies the proof needed to consider a supportive relationship in the award, modification or termination of alimony.  Finally, the new statute provides guidance for modifying or terminating alimony in the case of retirement of the payor. 

Durational alimony is further defined by the appropriate length and amount in given situations.  It is not appropriate for a court to award durational alimony for a marriage lasting less than 3 years.  For a marriage of 3-10 years, the durational alimony cannot be longer than ½ the length of the marriage.  For a marriage of 10-20 years, the duration of alimony would be up to 60% of the length of the marriage and for a marriage of more than 20 years, the duration of alimony would be up to 75% of the length of the marriage.  This duration may be extended in exceptional circumstances.  The amount of durational alimony is the lesser of the recipient’s need or 35% of the difference between the parties’ net incomes.  Net income is generally the gross monthly income less federal and state taxes, Medicare and social security deductions. 

While the new statute has provided much more guidance to the court and parties when alimony is requested or when a party seeks to modify or terminate a prior alimony award, there are still many factors to be considered in any question of alimony.  No short summary can fully explain the law or how it would apply to particular situations.  As always, it is best to seek the advice of an attorney whose practice focuses on family law in Florida before making any decision involving divorce. 

2020 Case Law Update

Once again I was invited to present the Annual Case Law Update to this years Family Court Professional Coalition (FCPC) Annual Conference. It is my great pleasure to work with this organization and serve on their Board of Directors in order to help improve the Family Court system in my local area. It is also an annual highlight to present this update of all legal cases involving family law decided in the last year from the Florida appellate courts. While I do not litigate, it remains important to stay up to date on the current law in order to assist my clients in reaching the best resolution to their cases. You can find my update here.

2019 Case Law Update

It is that time of year again. I just presented my annual Family Law Case Law Review to the 14th Annual Twelfth Judicial Circuit Family Court Professional Collaborative (FCPC) Conference. There were a lot of very interesting cases again this year. My full case law review can be found here.

Can I get Custody of Fido

I am often asked if my client can get custody of their favorite pet. Another common question is if the court can award visitation of their cat or dog. Unfortunately, in Florida, the answer to both of these questions is no. Pets are treated as property in Florida and most states, so one party is awarded ownership of the pets. This is painful for many people who consider their dog or cat a part of the family. I get it. I have a wonderful dog and a brand new cat that I already love dearly.

Beginning January 1, 2019 there are three states that now treat animals as more than property and allow the court to consider the best interest of the pet in awarding them to a party in a divorce. California has now joined Alaska and Illinois in providing custody of the pets. There are exceptions for service animals (they will remain with the person who requires them). These are new laws and there is not a lot of case law applying them.

We don’t know if this is a new trend that will take off in Florida or other states. We also don’t know if this will increase litigation in divorce cases as pet owners spend more time and money to establish the best interest of the pets.

What we do know is that in a Collaborative Divorce, we can already consider the pet as something more than property and help the family develop a plan that will share the pet.

Know the Value Before Mediation!

One of the most frustrating experiences I have as a mediator is when the final resolution of equitable distribution comes down to a disagreement about the value of a home or other real property.  The reason this is so frustrating is that it is so simple to avoid.  If you own real property, ensure that you have the information needed to substantiate your value before the mediation.  The most authoritative basis would be an appraisal of the property.  This can be done for a few hundred dollars and is well worth the investment.  If the parties do not want to invest in this analysis, they may decide to obtain a comparative market analysis from a local real estate broker.  This can be particularly helpful if the parties anticipate selling the home.  Hopefully the parties can agree to the selection of a well respected professional, either appraiser or realtor, to conduct the review and use this number provided by an agreed upon neutral professional.  If the parties cannot agree, then they can agree to each select one and then have them choose a third to use.  Alternatively, each can have a professional for their own use during the mediation and then negotiate between the two numbers provided.  Most importantly, if one party comes with a legitimate number from a professional and the other comes with nothing but their opinion, the second will be at a sever disadvantage in the negotiations.  I would also remind you that this lack of information includes simply having an opinion from a website such as Zillow or Realtor.  While these sites offer some insight, they are certainly not nearly as authoritative nor as complete as a comprehensive study from a professional.